Insights

Free Website Traffic Estimation Services – How Accurate Are They?

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009 by Steve

There are several reasons why an online marketer wants to know how much traffic a site other than their own is receiving:

  • You may want to compare how much traffic a competitors’ site is getting.
  • In reviewing the landscape of sites your target customers are visiting, you may want to ballpark the volume of traffic to each in order to get a sense of their relative prominence.
  • When reviewing the sources of traffic to your website, you may identify a new source that has had good conversion success and you may want to determine if they have a significant audience and would like to see if that audience is growing. If so, you may want to pursue a more in-depth relationship with that source.
  • It may also help to provide focus in trying to establish high quality links to your site for SEO purposes.

There are now several free traffic estimation services (Amit Agarwal did a nice job of outlining these options in his article, Find Out How Much Traffic a Website is Getting). However, one obvious question is how accurate is the data?

In order to help answer that question, we evaluated the quality of these estimation services against the web analytics data collected through Omniture, Google, etc. for a subset of our clients. We thought that the quality of those estimates might vary significantly depending upon how heavy the volume of traffic was to the site being estimated. As such, we grouped the results based on site activity: heavy, moderate, and light. When available, we also evaluated how accurately the services reflected the trend of the site traffic as well as the volume of visits and visitors for the following traffic estimation services: Alexa, Compete, Google Ad Planner, Google Trends, QuantCast, and StatBrain.

The following table shows how the free sources compared to the data collected by our clients’ analytics programs (e.g. Compete’s estimation of traffic for moderate sites was lower than reported by the analytics tools used by those sites).

Free Traffic Estimation Comparisons

I should note that this was not a formal study, was based upon a relatively small sample set, and other factors may impact the results (e.g. relative volume of paid search marketing may influence the accuracy of some sites versus others).

A few observations/conclusions:

  1. Not surprisingly, the quality of the estimates is considerably better for higher volume websites.
  2. At this point, there does not seem to be a reliable source for viewing site trends for lower volume websites and the trends for moderate traffic websites are not much better.
  3. The growing volume of incremental demographic information being provided by some of these services is encouraging. Most of the demographic information is fairly rudimentary, but it is definitely more than what has been available in the past.
  4. You should definitely review Dataopedia.com. In addition to pulling in data from Alexa, Compete, and QuantCast, this service displays other non-traffic related data such as Google Page Rank and Twitter posts related to the site.
  5. Given that none of the free services provided accurate estimates in every scenario, you may be able to use our findings to make adjustments for your specific situation.

Has anyone else conducted a similar comparison? If so, what type of results did you find?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 24th, 2009 at 8:12 am and is filed under E-Commerce, Metrics, Online Strategy, Search Marketing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 Responses to “Free Website Traffic Estimation Services – How Accurate Are They?”

  1. Danny Brown Says:

    Were the Quantcast sites all quantified (as in registered with Quantcast)? As I find it to be one of the best tools around, but it needs the information from the user to be so.

  2. web_sitetraffic Says:

    Very clear, informative stuff. Gonna share this with my readers on my site, if thats ok with you. Michael

  3. Ozella Prakoth Says:

    I’m not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for fantastic info I was looking for this information for my mission.

  4. beat headphones Says:

    San Diego lawyers

  5. Wilfredo Geerdes Says:

    Hello! Quality of free site traffic is more important than its quantity. A single relevant internet site visitor is a bit more useful than hundreds of irrelevant website visitors.

  6. anbieter internet Says:

    I love this information a person source for a content. We’ll bookmark your website as well as examine once again the following frequently. Now i am a little selected Let me be taught a wide range of completely new material here! All the best for the following!

  7. garage door security locks Says:

    They are also the entry through which very many people
    enter their homes at the end of long days. This article will take you through the steps to safely remove the
    hinge and roller assembly and replace the roller. Rolling
    shutters of ROMA have a patented sound body and are therefore pleasantly quiet.

  8. cardale garage door spares Says:

    Simply browse our website to learn more or contact us today at Houston
    Overhead Garage Doors. Palladium style windows, if they match the
    decor of your house can really make an great impression.
    He loves his house and can’t stop talking about the great people, the bustling library, and wonderful
    food that visitors can find in the area.

  9. michael kors outlet Says:

    It’s perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.
    I have read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things or
    suggestions. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article.
    I wish to read even more things about it!
    michael kors outlet

Leave a Reply: